Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Zoe's avatar

If a female athlete makes a choice about her body, for instance to have a baby, there will be consequences for her sporting career. Likewise for taking a banned substance, if she decides to take T there will be consequences: probable performance enhancement, physical changes, possible long-term health issues, potential suspension from her sport for doping. As you mention, some trans-identifying female athletes choose not to take T so they can still compete in the women’s competition, so why are sporting federations allowing people who claim to be non-binary a loophole? Should the non-binary category be a free-for-all? Can you attach a motor to your bike because your slower times make you dysphoric? Talk about wacky races! T is banned for good reason, as anyone who remembers the female East German swimmers of the 80s can attest. Claiming that your unverifiable synthetic sex identity somehow magically makes taking a performance enhancing drug acceptable or necessary is beyond bizarre.

Expand full comment
Betty C's avatar

Cal Calamina at least was not eligible for the prize money in spite of coming in first as a testosterone enhanced female in a made up category. She did not complete the series of six races of different lengths that was mandatory for prize money. Cue the whinging. In Boston the NB runners, both female and male bodied, are able to qualify for the race on the lower female standards. The hypocrisy and unfairness of these new rules for the self identifying so called non binary is an affront to women athletes.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts