Another great article Sarah! Witnessing such an "inclusive" community eat their young is impressive! Female athletes don't have issues with lesbians, asexual females or ladies who have sexual exploits. We just don't want a dick in the locker room or on the team.
"That rule required trans men on women’s college teams to refrain from testosterone-based hormone therapy. The USL W rule operates on the same principle. A trans man signed to a women’s team because the league has classified him as a woman, on the condition that he forgo the medical care that would change that classification, is not a milestone for trans inclusion. It is the policy outcome the right has been engineering for nearly ten years." Kvetching from Ari Drennen, which usefully confirms that Isaac isn't taking PEDs (she underwent a bilateral mastectomy), which is the only objection raised to her inclusion in female category.
"The cases the rule produces are not symmetric. A trans man, under birth-sex placement, is included in women’s competition. A trans woman, under the same rule, is excluded from competition entirely. This asymmetry is what the structural argument means when it says trans men, like other men, occupy a position of privilege relative to trans women — a claim that has become controversial but that the rule’s outputs make undeniable."
Trans identified males ("trans woman"/"trans girl") are not excluded from sporting competition, since they can compete with fellow males or in coed leagues. But they want to compete in an unsporting manner, by thrusting their way into female category, where they have male physical advantage.
Isaac's headline-grabbing experience, exactly like Swedish skier Elis Lundholm in this past winter Olympics, https://www.thefemalecategory.com/p/trans-identified-female-olympian, completely exposes gender ideology as a men's rights movement and trashes its foundational narratives—that the pushback on "transgender" athletes in women's sports is because of hate for their identity (they don't want us to exist), that people with trans identities MUST compete according to their identity or suffer existential harm (or that males with feminine identities will be mercilessly bullied by other males if they compete in the male category, for which there is zero evidence). "Trans rights" advocates very rightly point out that Elis and Isaac are shining examples of fair inclusion of trans-identified athletes in sports.
Oh gosh! The trans community! Women don’t hate trans people after all! Just like they said all along! It’s the men who want to cheat who have been lying! Quelle suprise! 🙄
Another great article Sarah! Witnessing such an "inclusive" community eat their young is impressive! Female athletes don't have issues with lesbians, asexual females or ladies who have sexual exploits. We just don't want a dick in the locker room or on the team.
If Drennen said the sun sits in the west, I'd spend six months verifying it.
When Drennen opens his mouth, all I hear is white noise and nothing to verify.
"That rule required trans men on women’s college teams to refrain from testosterone-based hormone therapy. The USL W rule operates on the same principle. A trans man signed to a women’s team because the league has classified him as a woman, on the condition that he forgo the medical care that would change that classification, is not a milestone for trans inclusion. It is the policy outcome the right has been engineering for nearly ten years." Kvetching from Ari Drennen, which usefully confirms that Isaac isn't taking PEDs (she underwent a bilateral mastectomy), which is the only objection raised to her inclusion in female category.
"The cases the rule produces are not symmetric. A trans man, under birth-sex placement, is included in women’s competition. A trans woman, under the same rule, is excluded from competition entirely. This asymmetry is what the structural argument means when it says trans men, like other men, occupy a position of privilege relative to trans women — a claim that has become controversial but that the rule’s outputs make undeniable."
Trans identified males ("trans woman"/"trans girl") are not excluded from sporting competition, since they can compete with fellow males or in coed leagues. But they want to compete in an unsporting manner, by thrusting their way into female category, where they have male physical advantage.
Isaac's headline-grabbing experience, exactly like Swedish skier Elis Lundholm in this past winter Olympics, https://www.thefemalecategory.com/p/trans-identified-female-olympian, completely exposes gender ideology as a men's rights movement and trashes its foundational narratives—that the pushback on "transgender" athletes in women's sports is because of hate for their identity (they don't want us to exist), that people with trans identities MUST compete according to their identity or suffer existential harm (or that males with feminine identities will be mercilessly bullied by other males if they compete in the male category, for which there is zero evidence). "Trans rights" advocates very rightly point out that Elis and Isaac are shining examples of fair inclusion of trans-identified athletes in sports.
So who has been lying all this time?
🤔
Oh gosh! The trans community! Women don’t hate trans people after all! Just like they said all along! It’s the men who want to cheat who have been lying! Quelle suprise! 🙄
It's so hilarious watching them trying to figure this situation out so it fits with their narrative.
Great article!
Trannys have just two arguments:
'M-muh ladyfeelz/manfeelz!'
'Reeeeeee!' So over these deviant mentally ill state-sanctioned junkies.