Tell that to the New York Road Runners and the Boston Athletic Association and the Chicago Marathon and the innumerable schools and sports organizations that prioritize gender identity over sex
Remembering the screeching about how passage of Title IX was going to take $ away from male sports, and the arguments used that if the females can't compete against males than female sports should not get any $, this is no surprise. The misogynistic men and women who live in a zero-sum world have been plotting and scheming since 1972 for a way to get rid of female sports, and here we are. Why a category for only non-binary? Are they phobic against the rest of the alphabet community? Since the alphabet soup is one big happy camper community, then they need "gender identity" sports. Sports separated by sex is for those who accept the reality of their sex. If the gender identity people want to invade and destroy sexed sports, they are sexphobic totalitarians (ST's). If the ST's gnash their teeth at the female category excluding males, then why would they make another category that excludes some? Why can't they just BeKind and compete in the men's category?
Sexphobic Totalitarians 👌. These are great points. How can the demi-boys, the genderfluxes and the genderfucks run their races as their true selves? What should race directors do with the gender-fluid? The implication of having a NB category is that the M and F categories are also identity based and as all identities cannot be accommodated, the natural conclusion and the only way to avoid transphobia is to get rid of all categories. Misogynists job done, Female sports eliminated.
Yes, that has been the goal all along imo. Here's another related thought. We've been screamed at by loons saying dudes in drag are real women. But we're also told there's some huge amount of violence and murder committed against dudes in drag, aka "real women." If they are "real women," then how did the loons come up with the idea there's excessive violence against the dragged dudes? How would anyone know a victim was a "transwoman" as opposed to a "non-trans" woman? Supposedly the "transwomen are real women" chant extends to "trans" not seeing the need to inform medical personnel of one's sex. It follows that coroners (or anyone else) wouldn't be able to differentiate a "transwoman" from a woman.
There's no such thing as "trans." It's a delusion, like a 70-pound anorexic who "feels" obese. "Gender" has no application to humans. There are two sexes, and you have no proof that a male can turn into a female. If you can, define both and prove it (NOBODY CAN). If a male "feels" like he's a female, he's mentally ill. It's a delusion, which is a symptom of a deeper problem. It's not an identity. Nobody "affirms" that; nobody gives liposuction to a starving 70-pound anorexic.
So the answer to everything, and I mean everything from sports to jails to surgery to pronouns, is NO. End of story.
That's all anyone needs. Wtf do you need DATA for? I need to research why Bruce Jenner in a weave isn't a woman? I need to research why mutilating mentally ill children is wrong? These idiots can't even define woman! THEY'RE the ones who need to prove their bullshit. All I need to do is point out the obvious. It literally takes under a minute to disprove "trans" bullshit.
It's not easy, and that's why it hasn't just been done. Even if a fair number of people who read The Female Category may agree with you, you must know that there are a whole contingent of people who feel just as strongly that trans is real and that trans women are women. Discounting others' strongly held beliefs because you don't agree with them is ineffective, just as calling an anorexic mentally ill and to just start eating already would be both insensitive and probably ineffective. We are where we are because people are resorting to emotional arguments. That's why we actually do need data. In this case, we can calmly and reasonably show race organizations that sex matters with regard to running races
There are schizophrenics who strongly "feel like" they're actually Napoleon. Do I need data to disprove this? If "trans" women are women, and these people are asked "what's a woman?" how do they respond? They can't. This is on THEM to prove. They're demanding that the whole world bend to their delusions and perversions. They can't even provide a definition.
Where's their data? Ask them to define man, define woman, then prove a man can become a woman and describe how. That's the bare minimum. This is their job. They can't because the whole thing is a lie.
These men are delusional. The vast majority of normal people see this. I don't need data to prove that males are larger, heavier, and have more upper body strength than women. Do I need to run a study to show that males can't get pregnant?
"Trans" is nothing but delusion. You simply say NO. That's where we will get to eventually, with no studies. Hold on, let me run a study on whether males or females can lift more weight.
I'm saying nobody needs to run a study to see if giving anorexics liposuction is a good idea. We live in clown world. The vast majority of people just want to hear cold, hard truths, not what you refer to as "data," which to me sounds like coddling.
I don't need data to say that Bruce Jenner is a man. His three ex-wives are women. End of.
And btw, the fear behind confronting the "trans" lie has nothing to do with data, but with money. People are petrified of being fired, deplatformed, cancelled, ostracized, etc. because the agenda is backed by billions and pushed by media, academia, govt, etc. It's not about data. It's about courage and money.
Remembering the screeching about how passage of Title IX was going to take $ away from male sports, and the arguments used that if the females can't compete against males than female sports should not get any $, this is no surprise. The misogynistic men and women who live in a zero-sum world have been plotting and scheming since 1972 for a way to get rid of female sports, and here we are. Why a category for only non-binary? Are they phobic against the rest of the alphabet community? Since the alphabet soup is one big happy camper community, then they need "gender identity" sports. Sports separated by sex is for those who accept the reality of their sex. If the gender identity people want to invade and destroy sexed sports, they are sexphobic totalitarians (ST's). If the ST's gnash their teeth at the female category excluding males, then why would they make another category that excludes some? Why can't they just BeKind and compete in the men's category?
Sexphobic Totalitarians 👌. These are great points. How can the demi-boys, the genderfluxes and the genderfucks run their races as their true selves? What should race directors do with the gender-fluid? The implication of having a NB category is that the M and F categories are also identity based and as all identities cannot be accommodated, the natural conclusion and the only way to avoid transphobia is to get rid of all categories. Misogynists job done, Female sports eliminated.
Yes, that has been the goal all along imo. Here's another related thought. We've been screamed at by loons saying dudes in drag are real women. But we're also told there's some huge amount of violence and murder committed against dudes in drag, aka "real women." If they are "real women," then how did the loons come up with the idea there's excessive violence against the dragged dudes? How would anyone know a victim was a "transwoman" as opposed to a "non-trans" woman? Supposedly the "transwomen are real women" chant extends to "trans" not seeing the need to inform medical personnel of one's sex. It follows that coroners (or anyone else) wouldn't be able to differentiate a "transwoman" from a woman.
Yeah, they're either "women" or "trans women", depending on which is most convenient in a given situation.
Here's the language and here's the data:
There's no such thing as "trans." It's a delusion, like a 70-pound anorexic who "feels" obese. "Gender" has no application to humans. There are two sexes, and you have no proof that a male can turn into a female. If you can, define both and prove it (NOBODY CAN). If a male "feels" like he's a female, he's mentally ill. It's a delusion, which is a symptom of a deeper problem. It's not an identity. Nobody "affirms" that; nobody gives liposuction to a starving 70-pound anorexic.
So the answer to everything, and I mean everything from sports to jails to surgery to pronouns, is NO. End of story.
That's all anyone needs. Wtf do you need DATA for? I need to research why Bruce Jenner in a weave isn't a woman? I need to research why mutilating mentally ill children is wrong? These idiots can't even define woman! THEY'RE the ones who need to prove their bullshit. All I need to do is point out the obvious. It literally takes under a minute to disprove "trans" bullshit.
This is easy. Just do it.
It's not easy, and that's why it hasn't just been done. Even if a fair number of people who read The Female Category may agree with you, you must know that there are a whole contingent of people who feel just as strongly that trans is real and that trans women are women. Discounting others' strongly held beliefs because you don't agree with them is ineffective, just as calling an anorexic mentally ill and to just start eating already would be both insensitive and probably ineffective. We are where we are because people are resorting to emotional arguments. That's why we actually do need data. In this case, we can calmly and reasonably show race organizations that sex matters with regard to running races
There are schizophrenics who strongly "feel like" they're actually Napoleon. Do I need data to disprove this? If "trans" women are women, and these people are asked "what's a woman?" how do they respond? They can't. This is on THEM to prove. They're demanding that the whole world bend to their delusions and perversions. They can't even provide a definition.
Where's their data? Ask them to define man, define woman, then prove a man can become a woman and describe how. That's the bare minimum. This is their job. They can't because the whole thing is a lie.
These men are delusional. The vast majority of normal people see this. I don't need data to prove that males are larger, heavier, and have more upper body strength than women. Do I need to run a study to show that males can't get pregnant?
"Trans" is nothing but delusion. You simply say NO. That's where we will get to eventually, with no studies. Hold on, let me run a study on whether males or females can lift more weight.
I'm saying nobody needs to run a study to see if giving anorexics liposuction is a good idea. We live in clown world. The vast majority of people just want to hear cold, hard truths, not what you refer to as "data," which to me sounds like coddling.
I don't need data to say that Bruce Jenner is a man. His three ex-wives are women. End of.
And btw, the fear behind confronting the "trans" lie has nothing to do with data, but with money. People are petrified of being fired, deplatformed, cancelled, ostracized, etc. because the agenda is backed by billions and pushed by media, academia, govt, etc. It's not about data. It's about courage and money.