Discussion about this post

User's avatar
SJDR's avatar

Genderweirds are absolutely, mind-bogglingly dumb as dirt, if they aren't basically sociopathic pseudo-criminals full of low cunning. Everything else about Hiltz's chosen self-delusion aside, there is absolutely no reason she can't get a double-masectomy. Just schedule it for a downtime in training, which have to exist unless her coaches and trainers are utterly inept. It's not like there's a rule that mandates breast tissue for females, and it seems vanishly unlikely there ever could be because that would be discriminatory against breast cancer survivors.

She's literally just complaining about that to get victim status. The way is clear for her if she wants it.

Expand full comment
Anna Still runs's avatar

It's extremely sad that the New York Times and Hiltz herself promotes the idea of healthy women cutting their breasts off as if it's just so incredibly progressive and brave. In actuality it is horrifying and tragic. Nikki Hiltz is setting a terrible example for all the young girls out there uncomfortable with meeting sexist standards of femininity. She promotes that the problem is not with the sexist expectations of society, but with one's own healthy female body. This is the furthest thing from 'progressive' imaginable.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts